[Test-ED Visits] Understanding Overdose Data

IVPB creates multiple resources to help keep our partners informed about overdoses in NC.

All IVPB overdose data resources can be found on the NC Overdose Epidemic Data webpage. This page includes:

  • Summary information on overdose deaths and emergency department (ED) visits in NC over time.
  • Interactive overdose data
  • Monthly reports
  • Other data resources and links to overdose prevention information

IVPB creates and shares these resources to support overdose prevention across NC. 

  • Permission is not needed to use any of the posted data in your presentations, manuscripts, reports and other work.
  • If you use IVPB published data, please include a version of the following citation:

    NC Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public Health, Injury & Violence Prevention Branch. ‘[data resource name].“ [webpage data were accessed from]. Accessed [insert access date]. [insert the website address]

For help finding the injury data you need, visit the NC Injury Data Resource Inventory. This interactive tool helps you identify which website or IVPB data source has the information that best meets your needs.
 

Below is a brief summary of each resource.

Overdose Data Resources

Use the monthly overdose reports for the most up-to-date data on fatal and nonfatal overdoses in your county and across the state.

Monthly Overdose Reports use provisional data to monitor overdose trends in NC before final data are available. These reports can be used to:

  • Monitor changes in the number of overdoses happening statewide or at the county level to know when to respond or act.
  • Know where overdoses are happening in the state and which groups are experiencing overdoses.
  • Focus prevention and response activities to groups that are most impacted by overdose.

For more information on using provisional data to monitor overdoses in NC, visit Using Provisional Overdose Data.

Monthly Overdose Reports are shared through a Google Drive folder.

  • Open the folder in the Google Drive for the report you are interested in.
  • Select the “Download” button on the far right of the screen to download the report.

Four reports are updated monthly with the most recent data.

Separate reports include data on overdose deaths, the most severe outcome of the overdose epidemic, and non-fatal overdoses. Use the reports together for a more complete picture of overdoses across the state.

Report NameDescription
Suspected Overdose Deaths
  • Using toxicology data from the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME), estimates how many overdose deaths have happened in NC in the last month.
    • There is a one-month delay for these reports (example: May 2025 report includes data through April 2025).
  • Monitors change in suspected overdose deaths over time.
    • Shows the total number of suspected overdoses that have happened so far in the current year compared to previous years, and the number of suspected overdoses each month.
  • Gives a more accurate and up-to-date estimate of overdose deaths than provisional death certificate data because of delays in death certificate coding.
Fentanyl-Positive Deaths

This report can be used as an early estimate for overdose deaths, since most overdoses (about 80%) in NC involve fentanyl.

  • Using OCME toxicology data, tracks deaths that tested positive for fentanyl but have not yet been confirmed with a final cause and intent of death.
    • There is a two-month delay for these reports (example: May 2025 report includes data through March 2025).
  • Monitors changes in overdose deaths over time.
    • Shows the total number of fentanyl-positive deaths that have happened so far in the current year compared to previous years, and the number of fentanyl-positive deaths each month over the last two years.
  • Available statewide and for many counties.
    • Includes data by county, sex, age group, and race/ethnicity to identify groups most impacted by fentanyl-positive death.
    • Statewide report also includes trends of other substances involved in fentanyl-positive deaths.
Opioid Overdose Emergency Department (ED) Visits
  • Tracks ED visits due to opioid overdose.
    • There is a one-month delay for these reports (example: May 2025 report includes data through April 2025).
  • Monitors changes in opioid overdose ED visits over time.
    • Shows the total number of opioid overdose ED visits that have happened in the most recent month and so far in the current year, compared to previous years. 
  • Available statewide and for many counties.
    • Includes data by county, sex, age group, and race/ethnicity to identify groups most impacted by overdose.
    • Includes data on the type of opioid contributing to these opioid overdose ED visits.
All Drug Overdose Emergency Department (ED) Visits
  • Tracks ED visits related to drug overdose.
    • There is a one-month delay for these reports (example: May 2025 report includes data through April 2025).
  • Monitors changes in drug overdose ED visits over time.
    • Shows the total number of drug overdose ED visits that have happened in the most recent month and so far in the current year, compared to previous years.
  • Available statewide and for many counties.
    • Includes data by county, sex, age group, and race/ethnicity to identify groups most impacted by overdose.
    • Includes data on the drug classes contributing to drug overdose ED visits.

There are additional overdoses that may not be captured in these reports, for example, if someone does not seek medical treatment after an overdose. But these reports can provide important context to support planning and response.

Use the interactive overdose data tool to access overdose data if you are comfortable using data dashboards to query and filter data.

The interactive overdose data can be used to:

  • Filter data for metrics by place, statewide or by county.
  • Monitor changes in the number and rate of overdose metrics to help know when to respond or act in your community.
    • Compare the change in the selected metric from year to year.
    • Compare the rates for the selected metric to the statewide rate and across counties.
    • Monitor whether rates for a selected place (state/county) are high, low, or about the same as the rate for other places in NC over time.

Overview of Overdose Metrics

The interactive overdose data include metrics that describe overdose deaths, ED visits, opioid and buprenorphine dispensing, opioid use disorder treatment services, and foster care due to parental substance use.

  • Some metrics are reported as a rate per 100,000 while others are reported as a percentage (rate per 100).
  • The timeframe of data used for each metric and how often data are updated depends on the source of the data.
  • For more detailed information on the case definitions used for each metric, visit NC IVPB Injury Case Definitions.
Death Data Metrics
  • Include annual data for 2010 forward.
  • The death metrics for the most recent year are projected yearly estimates based on what has been reported so far. For example:
    • There were 1,071 overdose deaths from January–April 2024, representing a projected 3,213 overdose deaths in 2024.
  • Estimates will always be made using at least three months of provisional data.
    • For example, estimates of 2025 overdose deaths will not be reported until data for January-March 2025 are close to being complete, likely in March 2026.
    • Because of these data availability requirements and the delay in death data, there is at least a three-month lag in reporting projected deaths for the previous year. 
  • These estimates of overdose death are updated monthly and likely become more accurate as additional cases are finalized.
  • For more information, visit Using Provisional Overdose Data or the general injury provisional factsheet.
ED Visit Data Metric
  • Includes annual data for 2016 forward. Visit Using Provisional Data for Monitoring Injuries for more information.
  • ED visit data are the timeliest data available but take time to finalize.
    • ED visit data are updated monthly with a one-month delay in reporting.
    • The most recent ED visit data are provisional and subject to change as visit data are finalized. For more information, visit Using Provisional Overdose Data.
  • The ED visit data metric for the most recent year is also a projected yearly estimate based on what has been reported so far.
    • See the example above for Death Data Metrics.
Other Metrics
  • All other metrics are updated annually with the most recent year of final data.
  • Controlled Substances Reporting System (CSRS) metrics include data for 2013 forward.
  • Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Use Services (DMH) treatment metric includes data 2014 forward.
  • Division of Social Services (DSS) metric includes data for 2015 forward.

Use the downloadable statewide overdose data to conduct your own analyses and create your own data visualizations using NC overdose data.

All of the data used to populate the Interactive Overdose Data on the NC Overdose Epidemic Data webpage are included in a downloadable CSV file.

  • Data are available for each metric at the state and county level.
  • Each row represents the data for a given metric for each year and each place (county/statewide).
    • Data include the number of events for each metric, the rate (percentage or rate per 100,000 NC population), and the change in the rate compared to the previous year.
  • There is an accompanying data dictionary available that describes each of the variables included in the downloadable data.

Use the core overdose prepared PowerPoint slides to include overdose data in your next presentation, or as a resource to understand more about overdoses in NC.

The Core Overdose Slide Set gives an overview of the history of the epidemic in NC, present statewide overdose trends, our state’s actions to prevent overdoses, and the connection between overdoses and other public health topics.

These slides can be used to:

  • Understand the who, what, when, where and why of overdose in NC.
    • These PowerPoint slides are meant to offer a state-level background on drug overdose.
    • The slides were created to provide basic data trends and
      public health surveillance
      around the drug overdose epidemic.
  • Incorporate overdose data into your own presentations, grant proposals, reports or any other way they may be useful.
    • Each slide includes detailed notes explaining the information on the slide.
    • Technical notes are also available to help with understanding and presenting data.

NC-SUDORS combines data from death certificates, medical examiner reports and toxicology results. The system is a critical tool for understanding the overdose epidemic and providing high-quality data to guide public health interventions.

These data include information on circumstances surrounding unintentional overdose deaths, like overdose and substance abuse treatment history, routes of drug use and if naloxone was given.

Case-Level Data 

Use case-level NC-SUDORS data to research overdose deaths of unintentional and undetermined intent or to inform local overdose response efforts.

  • Researchers may request NC-SUDORS data to conduct their own research.
  • Local health departments may request their jurisdiction’s NC-SUDORS data to aid in their response efforts, including overdose fatality reviews.
  • More information on how to request detailed case-level NC-SUDORS data is available on the NC Overdose Epidemic Data webpage.

NC-SUDORS Factsheets

Use NC-SUDORS factsheets for data on overdose deaths by county and congressional district.

NC-SUDORS creates fact sheets for each NC county and congressional district that include data specific to that area of the state. These factsheets can be used to:

  • Understand which groups are experiencing overdoses within a given county or congressional district
  • Understand how overdoses in a county or congressional district compare to overdoses across the state.
  • Understand the circumstances surrounding overdoses in a given county or congressional district to help inform overdose prevention in that area. 

Use these additional data resources to understand factors that contribute to the overdose crisis in NC.

  • Resources include information on mental health and overdose, homelessness and overdose, and other overdose-related topics.

How IVPB Uses Provisional Overdose Data

What Are Provisional Data?

Provisional data are early numbers that have not been fully checked or do not have all the information they normally have before being considered final.

Provisional data allow us to:

  • Access information quickly.
  • Spot changes in injury trends before the final data are ready.
  • See patterns that help us know when to take action.

For more information on provisional data and when they become available, visit How IVPB Uses Provisional Data.

Downloadable PDF version: Using Provisional Overdose Data

What to Know

  • Because data are always being collected and updated, provisional data can change as new information is added.
  • How complete provisional data are varies by data source, data system and when the data are accessed.
  • The quality and completeness of the information can also be different for different groups of people.

Whenever provisional data are used a note should be included to indicate the data are provisional.

  • This allows people to know that the data can change so they can use the data appropriately.
  • For example:
    • Report Title – North Carolina Emergency Department (ED) Visits for Opioid Overdose: April 2025* Update
    • Report Footnote – *Data for 2024 - 2025 ED visits are provisional.

  • ED data from the NC Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (NC DETECT) are used to create monthly overdose reports at the state and county levels on ED visits for opioid overdose and ED visits for all drug overdoses.
  • These reports are posted to the NC IVPB Overdose Epidemic Data website and are shared with partners across the state to help health officials and communities make decisions.

Provisional ED visit data are also available to authorized local or state public health users in “near real time” through the NC DETECT data portal. Since the data are updated often, running the same search at different times might give varying results as new information is added.

Using provisional death certificate data as soon as they are reported can show fewer overdose deaths than there really were.

This is because some records may not be fully updated with the correct overdose code.

  • There is a delay in death certificate data in all states.
    • Overdose deaths take longer to finalize because they need time for investigation.
    • It takes time to confirm the cause of death and assign an International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) code. These are codes used to classify and describe the primary and underlying causes of death.
  • Coding of death certificates currently takes longer in NC than in most other states because of system changes and delays in autopsy reporting.
  • Provisional death certificates may have a pending ICD-10 cause of death code (R99) when they are first reported into the state’s system to track death records, NC DAVE (Database Application for Vital Events).
    • This code is usually updated to a more specific cause of death code before the
    • NC death certificate data are finalized.
    • Many deaths confirmed as overdoses in the final death certificate data were first reported to NC DAVE with a R99 code.
Why is this important?
  • CDC, the media and others report estimated overdoses for states using data states submit to a national system at CDC.
  • For NC, using provisional data from the national system can be a problem.
    • Longer delays in death certificate coding in NC may cause provisional data to be more incomplete than they are for other states.
  • Delays in coding can make it look as if there have been fewer overdose deaths in NC than there really were.

Each indicator considers the delay in death certificate coding in its own way.

Because of this, data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other NC programs can be different from the data shared by IVPB. NC and national indicators are described further below.

IVPB has worked with the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) to create faster indicators to track overdose deaths using OCME data.

Not all overdose deaths have been assigned an ICD-10 code for overdose in the provisional death certificate data yet.

  • This can make it seem like there has been a big decrease in overdoses in NC.
  • The NC Suspected Overdose Deaths indicator using OCME data provides a more realistic idea of the changes in overdose deaths in the state.
  • IVPB waits six months before using provisional death certificate data, allowing more time for overdose deaths to be assigned an ICD-10 code for overdose.

Percent Change in the Number of Overdose Deaths from October 2023 to October 2024 Across Provisional Overdose Death Indicators

This figure compares the percent change in the number of overdose deaths identified using the CDC Reported (-47.5%) and Predicted (-45.1%) Overdose Death Indicators that use death certificate data compared to the NC Suspected Overdose Death Indicator (-27%) that uses OCME data from October 2023 to October 2024.

For more information on differences between IVPB data and data reported from other sources, visit Differences in Reported Data.

 

Indicators to Track Provisional Overdose Deaths in NC

Indicators Recommended by NC

NC Suspected Overdose Deaths

  • Estimates overdose deaths using data from OCME.
  • Gives a more accurate and up-to-date count of overdose deaths.
  • Only available at the state-level with a one-month delay.
  • Some suspected overdoses may be reported as non-poisoning deaths in the final death certificate data, but most are confirmed as poisoning deaths.
    • There was a 2% difference between the number of suspected and confirmed overdose deaths from 2019-2023.
Last 24 Months of Overdose Deaths, Comparing Death Certificates Coded for Overdose to the Suspected Overdose Indicator Using OCME Data
Graph shows overdose deaths appear delayed in official records, but OCME suspected data gives a faster picture until records catch up.
This figure compares the number of deaths with an ICD-10 code for overdose in the death certificate data to the suspected overdose deaths identified using OCME data over the last 24 months. The overdose trend using death certificate data aligns closely with the suspected overdose death trend after about a 6-month lag. The suspected overdose death indicator helps to monitor trends before a specific ICD-10 code is assigned to the death.

YearMonthSuspected Overdose DeathsDeath Certificate with a Code for Overdose
2023April373377
2023May398435
2023June368394
2023July348372
2023August334361
2023September353348
2023October348364
2023November324331
2023December303341
2024January310313
2024February264246
2024March267261
2024April272251
2024May278231
2024June275224
2024July239218
2024August209171
2024September224182
2024October249144
2024November218146
2024December220122
2025January2470
2025February2210
2025March2700

 

Fentanyl-Positive Deaths

  • Tracks deaths that tested positive for fentanyl but have not yet been confirmed with a final cause and intent of death using OCME toxicology data.
  • Available at the state and county level with a three-month delay.
  • Can be used as an early estimate when death certificate data have not been coded yet, since most overdoses in NC involve fentanyl (about 80%).
  • It may be decided that fentanyl was not the main cause of death, but most are reported as overdoses.

CDC Indicators

CDC Predicted Overdose Deaths

  • Created by the CDC to help estimate how many people died from overdoses across the country and in each state/jurisdiction.
  • Uses provisional data that are regularly reported to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) from states and jurisdictions.
  • Factors in missing overdose death reports.
  • Can still underestimate overdose deaths because of the delays in coding.

CDC Reported Overdose Deaths

  • Measures the number of deaths that have been reported and labeled with an ICD-10 code for an overdose in the death certificate data.
  • Underestimates the true number of overdose deaths because of the longer delay in coding in the death certificate data.
  • May miss overdose deaths in NC that get an ICD-10 code after the National Vital Statistics data are finalized.

For more information on differences between NC and national data sources, visit Differences in Reported Data.

Updates to Indicators Used to Monitor Overdose Emergency Department Visits

Downloadable PDF: Updates to Overdose Emergency Department Visit Indicators

In 2026, IVPB updated the indicators used to monitor emergency department (ED) visits for overdoses of unintentional and undetermined intent in the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (NC DETECT). 

These indicators track ED visits related to acute medication/drug overdoses, including opioid overdoses. They do not include ED visits related to alcohol or chronic effects of substance use, unless a medication/drug overdose was also identified within the visit. 

This change in the indicators:

  • Identifies more ED visits due to overdose in NC DETECT.
  • Aligns IVPB case definitions for overdose ED visits more closely to CDC overdose case definitions that were released in 2024.
  • Gives a more realistic idea of the burden of overdose in NC.

New indicators find about 1,000 more overdose cases statewide each month for 2026 year to date. However, the trend, or overall pattern in overdose ED visits over time, does not change.

What to Know

Syndromic surveillance systems help to detect, understand and monitor health threats quickly, in near real time. 

  • These systems use syndromes, a type of indicator, to identify ED visits based on keywords and phrases, as well as ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes.
  • For more information, visit Understanding Surveillance Case Definitions.
  • NC DETECT is NC's statewide syndromic surveillance system.
  • NC DETECT is the timeliest data source available to monitor overdoses.

Monthly Overdose ED Visit Reports have been updated to use these new indicators. 

Case definitions for NC overdose indicators were updated to be more similar to indicators the CDC uses.

Below is a comparison of what elements are included in the new NC indicators and the CDC indicators compared to the old NC indicators. 

This table shows the differences between what is included in the new NC and CDC overdose indicators and what was included in the overdose indicators NC used previously. The new indicators include three additional elements.
Elements of Overdose ED Visit IndicatorsCDC/New NC IndicatorsOld NC Indicators
ICD-10-CM Codes for Unintentional Overdosesxx
ICD-10-CM Codes for Overdoses of Undetermined Intentx 
ICD-10-CM F-Codes for Substance Use with Intoxicationx 
Overdose and Drug Keywords in the Chief Complaint Fieldx 

New indicators find about 1,000 more overdose cases statewide each month for 2026 year to date. However, the trend, or overall pattern in overdose ED visits over time, does not change. 

Image explaining that the open circle is the old NC indicator and the closed circle is the CDC/new NC indicator.
Figure compares estimated all drug and opioid overdoses using old vs new indicators; new indicators identify more ED visits.
This figure shows the difference in the estimated number of all drug overdoses and of opioid overdoses that were identified using the old NC indicator compared to the new NC indicator. The new indicator identifies additional ED visits for both indicators.

The CDC released updated overdose case definitions in 2024. After validating the new CDC case definitions, IVPB decided to implement similar changes to align NC's overdose case definitions more closely to CDC's.

  • IVPB compared the CDC indicators used to monitor overdose ED visits nationally with NC indicators in NC DETECT.
    • CDC indicators identified more cases by using overdose keywords found in the chief complaint, ICD-10-CM codes for substance abuse and overdoses of undetermined intent, and additional ICD-10-CM codes in their case definitions.
    • Including keywords can help find ED visits for overdoses that haven’t been assigned an ICD-10-CM code for an overdose yet.
    • After a detailed review, most of these additional cases could be validated as overdoses and should be included.

Please reach out to us with any questions you may have about this change.

What Should I Know Before Using Overdose Data?

IVPB overdose data can be used many ways, from identifying risks, tracking trends and developing effective prevention strategies, to supporting advocacy, funding decisions and public awareness campaigns.

This document outlines what you should know and consider before using the data included in the IVPB overdose data resources.

Language Matters

The language used to describe and communicate overdose has important impact on overdose prevention.

Negative language can contribute to stigma.

Stigma is when someone is viewed in a negative way because of particular characteristics or attributes, like their skin color, culture, substance use, or mental illness.

Negative language and stigma about substance use can make it harder for people to use drugs to ask for help or get the support they need.

  • Stigmatizing words such as "addict" reduce a person to only their drug use.
  • Not everyone who uses drugs has a substance use disorder or requires treatment.
  • Referring people who use drugs and talking about substance use disorder in a more accurate and humanizing way can reduce stigma and help people receive appropriate treatment or support.

For more information on suggested language to use, words and phrases to avoid when talking about overdose and substance use, and other ways to stop stigma, visit Stop the Stigma.

More information on stigma and overdose is available at:

Data Considerations

Who Is Included in Overdose Data?
Occurrence vs Residence When Measuring Overdose

Occurrence describes where something happened. Residence describes the area where someone has reported that they live.

  • Residence Rates
    Most overdose metrics are limited to overdoses among NC residents. County-level data are limited to county residents.
    • Limiting to residents allows for rate calculations using NC resident population estimates.
      • This ensures that the information used to calculate rates is consistent.
      • Limiting to residents allows for more accurate comparisons across groups and between counties.
    • This excludes people that overdose in a county but are not residents of that county.
      • Someone living in a county, but who has not yet updated their residence status to that county would also be excluded.
    • While limiting to county residents works well for most counties, there are some counties where this limitation has a large impact on the local overdose rate.
  • Occurrence Rates
    Occurrence rates include all overdoses that happened in a given area, regardless of whether the individuals were residents of that area.
    • For counties with lots of people coming and going, the occurrence rate is often higher than the resident rate. This is especially true for:
      • Counties with college towns.
      • Counties that have popular tourist destinations, or beach towns.
      • Counties or areas with large populations of people experiencing homelessness.
    • Limiting to residents would exclude these transient populations and can underestimate the burden of overdose on local systems.
    • Counting cases based on where they happen rather than where people live helps us understand how overdose affects local systems and services and can inform local overdose prevention planning.
  • Injury Location
    Where an overdose death occurs can be different from where the injury occurred. This distinction can also impact differences in occurrence vs resident rates of overdose injury and death.
    • This distinction is especially true in rural areas where a single hospital or health care facility may serve a large area across multiple counties.
    • Someone may overdose in one county and then be transported and later die in a hospital in another county.
      • This transfer of care to another county is common for people with serious injuries that require treatment at a designated trauma center.

For more information on overdose case definitions, visit Understanding Injury Surveillance Case Definitions.

What Is Counted in Overdose Data?

The types of substances that are included can differ between overdose metrics.

  • Some overdose metrics include information on overdoses of all intents (e.g. unintentional, undetermined, self-inflicted, assault).
  • Some metrics are limited by intent.
  • Some metrics include specific types of overdoses (e.g. fentanyl overdose, heroin overdose, benzodiazepine overdose).

What is included when measuring overdoses depends on the case definition and the data source being used. These differences are outlined in more detail in the following data source specific considerations sections.

What Else is Measured to Monitor the Impacts of Substance Use?
Substance Use

IVPB monitors the impacts of substances that can alter a person’s mental or physical state, including:

  • Illegal drugs like cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine and illicitly manufactured fentanyl.
  • Legal substances like prescription medications that may be used inappropriately.
    • Someone misusing their own prescription medications.
    • Using someone else’s prescription or taking a prescription medication without a doctor’s prescription.

There are other substances IVPB does not include in overdose surveillance, like alcohol (ethanol), cannabis and tobacco (nicotine).

  • While these substances do alter a person’s mental or physical state and do cause negative health outcomes, they are not the focus of overdose surveillance.
  • IVPB monitors some of these substances separately from overdose surveillance.
    • IVPB does track drug overdoses that also involve alcohol.
Type of SubstanceDetails
Alcohol
  • Alcohol is a substance that kills more people than drug overdose each year.
  • IVPB also monitors alcohol deaths that do not involve other drugs as well as the overall impacts of alcohol use.
  • For more information, visit NC Alcohol Use and Related Harms Prevention.
Cannabis
  • It is very rare for someone to die from using only cannabis (without the use of other drugs), but using cannabis can still cause many health problems.
  • IVPB has collaborated with NC DETECT to establish case definitions to identify ED visits related to cannabis use.
    • These definitions offer a baseline to monitor any health impacts caused by future cannabis legislation changes.
    • ICD-10-CM codes used to classify cannabis-related ED visits are general. They include ED visits where cannabis was a primary reason for the visit, when cannabis use may have been a contributing factor and if there was a history of cannabis use.
    • For more information on the type of ED visits involving cannabis, groups impacted and how the cannabis case definition was validated, visit NC DETECT’s Mental & Behavioral Health Syndrome Validation Report.
  • For more information on the impacts of cannabis products, visit Looks can be deceiving: Keeping Kids Safe from Cannabis Edibles.
Tobacco
  • IVPB does not focus on the impact of tobacco use. This work is conducted by the NCDHHS Tobacco Prevention and Control Branch.
  • The Tobacco Prevention and Control Branch leads efforts to:
    • Prevent initiation of tobacco/nicotine use
    • Promote quitting tobacco/nicotine among adults and youth
    • Eliminate exposure to secondhand smoke and secondhand aerosol
    • Understanding differences to identify and eliminate
      commercial tobacco
      product-related disparities among NC populations and communities

Drug Withdrawal in Newborns

IVPB does not directly monitor drug withdrawal in newborns.

Not all drug withdrawal among newborns is due to illicit drug use.

  • Some infants go through withdrawal because their parent was taking medications prescribed during pregnancy.
  • Continuing medications like methadone and buprenorphine is currently recommended to treat opioid use disorder during pregnancy.

For data on drug withdrawal in newborns, visit the NC Maternal and Infant Health Data Dashboard.

No single data source captures the full scope of the overdose burden in NC. Data sources should be used together to fully understand the statewide impact of overdose.

Overdose Death Data
Intent of Overdose Deaths within Death Certificate Data

The case definition used to identify overdoses in the death certificate data includes overdoses of all intents.

  • While most (95%) of the overdose deaths in NC are unintentional, the overdose death case definition also includes overdoses of undetermined intent and self-inflicted overdoses.
    • Self-inflicted overdoses are also included in self-inflicted injury and suicide metrics.
  • For more information, visit the following Changes in Overdose Death Data, Intent of Overdose Deaths section.
  • For more information on injury intent, visit Injury Mechanism and Intent.
Understanding Substances Involved in Overdose Deaths

Most overdose deaths involve polysubstance use, or the use of multiple substances together.

  • We can’t know from death data whether someone was intentionally using multiple substances, or if their polysubstance use was unintended.
    • For example, someone might not know the stimulant they used also contained fentanyl.

The OCME tests for substances involved in overdose deaths during their investigations.

  • The OCME Toxicology Laboratory is the only Postmortem laboratory in NC and performs testing on approximately 15,000 cases a year.
    • The OCME Toxicology Laboratory is accredited by the College of American Pathologists, Laboratory Accreditation Program.
  •  OCME currently uses the following testing strategy related to overdose deaths.
    • Drug Screen: Basic — Tests for 29 common drugs and is added to select cases where the cause of death is already known.
    • Drug Screen: Expanded — Tests for almost 100 substances and is completed for all suspected overdose deaths or when the cause of death is unknown.
    • Drug Screen: Comprehensive — Tests for additional rare or novel substances and will only be done by pathologist request when there is reason to check for a substance not included in the initial drug screen.
  • Toxicology labs can’t test for every possible substance during investigations because of limits on funding, time and staffing.
    • OCME tests for the most common drugs and poisons, but not every possible substance that may have contributed to a person’s death.
  • OCME is working on expanding the types of cases with a known cause of death that receive a Drug Screen-Basic. These deaths have not historically been included in the drug testing strategy.
Overdose ED Visit Data

ED visit data are encounter-based, meaning that the same person may be involved in multiple ED visits during any given time period.

Data Quality
  • Trends may be impacted by missing data.
  • There was a large drop in the number of people going to the ED for any reason (ED utilization) starting in March 2020 when the COVID-19 stay-at-home order was implemented.
    • ED utilization slowly increased but remained lower than normal throughout most of that year.
    • This drop in ED utilization also impacted the number of ED visits for specific injuries, including overdoses in 2020.
Identifying Overdoses in ED visit Data

ICD-10-CM are codes used to group and classify diagnoses and reasons for health care visits in administrative health care systems, including ED visit data.

  • ED visits with an ICD-10-CM code for an overdose listed anywhere in the record are included as overdose ED visits.
  • IVPB does not exclude ED visits where the patient is admitted to the hospital or visits that result in death.
    • Including ED visits resulting in hospitalization or death helps us understand the full burden of overdose and other injuries on the NC health care system.
    • These records are excluded in national case definitions. This variation in case dentitions can contribute to differences in the number of overdose ED visits IVPB identifies compared to those shared by CDC or other sources.
  • ICD-10-CM codes are intended for administrative and billing purposes, not
    public health surveillance
    .
    • External cause of injury codes used to identify overdoses and other types of injuries are not required for billing.
    • This purpose can affect which codes are or are not assigned to a record, and therefore which events are included or excluded as injury cases.
    • For more information, visit Understanding Injury Surveillance Case Definitions.
  • Some ED visit case definitions also search for the chief complaint and/or triage notes fields for keywords to identify overdose-related ED visits.
    • Because these definitions also use keywords, they identify more ED visits related to overdose than when using ICD-10-CM codes alone.
    • For more information, visit Updates to Overdose ED Indicators.
ED Visits with Multiple Overdose ICD-10-CM Codes

Some ED visits for overdose may receive multiple ICD-10-CM codes related to the overdose event and for other types of injuries.

  • Multiple Substances Involved
    • There may be more than one code to describe multiple substances involved in the overdose.
  • Multiple Overdose Intents
    • In some instances, there may be multiple codes with conflicting overdose intent information, like a code for unintentional drug overdose and another for self-inflicted drug overdose.
      • The ICD-10-CM coding guidance defaults to classifying injuries, including overdoses, as unintentional.
      • Multiple codes may be used to document different aspects of the ED visit, which can contribute to conflicting or inconsistent coding.
  • Multiple Injuries Identified
    • There may be codes to describe multiple types of injuries like drug overdose and a fall, or overdose and self-inflicted injury.
    • A visit with multiple ICD-10-CM codes is counted once in each category of injury that applies to that ED visit, but only once in the total number of injury ED visits.

For example:

  • An ED visit that had a code for an unintentional overdose involving multiple substance types would be counted one time each in:
    • The total number of overdose ED visits for each substance type
    • The total number of unintentional injury ED visits
    • The total number of medication/drug overdose ED visits
    • The total number of injury ED visits
  • An ED visit that had a code for both an unintentional overdose and a self-inflicted overdose would be counted one time each in:
    • The total number of overdose ED visits for each substance type
    • The total number of unintentional injury ED visits
    • The total number of self-inflicted injury ED visits
    • The total number of medication/drug overdose ED visits
    • The total number of injury ED visits
  • Similarly, if multiple types of injuries were identified, like overdose and a fall injury, the ED visit would be counted once in each of those injury mechanism categories.
Type of Substances in Non-Fatal Overdose

It is difficult to identify the specific substances involved in overdose ED visits.

  • Comprehensive toxicology testing is rarely done in the ED or in the hospital. When it is done, the toxicology results are not directly shared with IVPB for overdose surveillance, although results may improve how detailed the ICD-10-CM codes are that are assigned to the record.
    • The substance type is unknown for many overdose ED visits, and it is possible that a patient consumed a substance or multiple substances that were not tested for.
    • The focus in the ED is on treating and stabilizing the patient rather than identifying a specific substance involved in the overdose.
  • Providers may not ask what substances a person has taken and may instead make a best guess based on how the patient presents to the ED.
    • If a patient experiencing an overdose responds to naloxone, providers will likely code the visit as being related to an opioid overdose.
  • When providers do ask, it is still difficult to know for sure what substances were involved in an overdose.
    • Some patients may choose not to disclose what substances they took.
    • Some patients may not know what they took or if what they took had been laced with something else.

Even though we often do not know the exact substances involved, ED visit data are still useful for tracking overdose trends.

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Data

EMS data are encounter-based, meaning that the same person may be involved in multiple EMS responses during any given time period.

IVPB is currently using EMS data to monitor suspected opioid overdoses.
  • Naloxone (Narcan) administration is used in combination with other information from the EMS response to estimate suspected EMS responses for opioid overdose.\
    • For more detailed information about how suspected overdoses are identified in the EMS data, visit EMS Syndrome Definitions.
  • Case definitions for identifying overdoses from other substances in the EMS data may be developed in the future.
Current EMS Case Definitions for Overdose May be Missing People.
  • EMS suspected overdose cases do not include overdoses from other non-opioid substances.
    • Naloxone only reverses overdoses from opioids. If someone overdoses from another substance, naloxone will not be effective.
      • First responders typically administer naloxone when it appears a person has overdosed since so many substances can be laced with opioids, like fentanyl.
    • Similarly, if someone mixed multiple substances, they may not have the anticipated response to naloxone.
      • If a person took opioids, they may still exhibit signs and symptoms from another non-opioid substance after naloxone is administered.
  • EMS is not involved in all overdoses.
    • People who experience an overdose may go to the ED on their own, be transported privately by someone other than EMS personnel or choose not to seek treatment.
    • Some people may be afraid to call EMS for help after an overdose because of negative perceptions of or interactions with law enforcement.
    • EMS may be called less frequently to respond to opioid overdoses as naloxone becomes more available throughout communities and as more people are comfortable using it on their own.
  • Assumptions about drug use can impact who shows up in EMS overdose data.
    • Different populations or groups tend to use drugs differently.
    • Because of this, first responders may assume that the person was or was not using certain substances based on how they look.

When changes are made to overdose surveillance case definitions, those changes are also applied to historical data whenever possible.

  • The changes are applied retroactively so that overdoses can be counted the same way across multiple years of data.
    • This allows IVPB to accurately monitor overdose trends.
  • Data IVPB shared before a change was implemented can be different from data shared for the same time-period today.
    •  Use the data resources posted to the NC Overdose Epidemic Data webpage to be sure you are accessing the most up to date information on overdose in NC.
    • If you have questions about data you have received from IVPB previously, email us at SubstanceUseData@dhhs.nc.gov.
Changes in Overdose Death Data
Type of Drug Overdose Deaths
  • Before 2020, public facing overdose dashboard metrics originally showed only opioid-related overdoses. These metrics have since been expanded to include overdoses from all medications and drugs.
    • NC-SUDORS started collecting data on fatal unintentional or undetermined intent opioid-related overdoses in 2018. The case definition was expanded in NC and nationally in 2019 to collect data on all drug overdose deaths of unintentional or undetermined intent.
    • IVPB always tracked all drug overdoses across other data sources, but primary focused on opioid-related overdoses before this change.
Intent of Overdose Deaths
  • Before 2020, most public overdose death certificate data metrics were limited to unintentional overdoses, which represents most (95%) of the overdose deaths in NC.
    • The definition now includes overdoses of all intents (e.g. undetermined intent, assaults and self-inflicted overdoses).
    • Self-inflicted overdoses are also included in self-inflicted injury and suicide metrics.
  • It may sometimes be difficult to determine if an overdose was unintentional, given the overlap between mental illness and substance use.
    • NC OCME works hard to assign a specific intent for overdose deaths, which is not the case in every state.
    • Many other jurisdictions outside of NC have a much larger number of overdoses of undetermined intent.
  • Including overdoses of all intents helps to:
    • Align the NC overdose case definition more closely with definitions used by the CDC.
    • Ensure everyone who experienced an overdose is represented in the data.
    • Simplify and improve consistency in communication and language around overdose data.
    • Align how overdoses are counted with overdose prevention.
  • Strategies for preventing unintentional overdose can also be helpful in addressing self-inflicted overdoses.
Changes in Overdose ED Visit Data
ICD-10-CM Coding Transition

The system used to code diagnoses and other information in ED visit, hospital discharge and other outpatient data was updated in 2015.

  • The codes used previously (ICD-9-CM codes) are not directly comparable to the new codes (ICD-10-CM codes).
  • Since the data are not comparable, data from before 2016 are not usually shared.

For more information on this transition and impacts to injury surveillance, visit ICD-10-CM Coding Transition.

Type of Drug Overdose ED Visits
  • Before 2020, public facing overdose dashboard and monthly report ED visit metrics originally tracked only opioid-related overdoses.
  • These overdose ED metrics have since been expanded to include overdoses from all medications and drugs.
  • In 2026, metrics were expanded to include key words in addition to ICD-10-CM codes to identify overdose ED visits.
Intent of Overdose ED Visits
  • Before 2020, most ED visit definitions for overdose were limited to unintentional overdoses.
    • In 2020, these overdose ED visit definitions were expanded from just unintentional overdoses to include both unintentional overdoses and overdoses of undetermined intent.
  • The ED visit definition for opioid overdoses included all intents between 2017 and 2025.
    • This definition was updated in 2026 to unintentional opioid overdose and opioid overdoses of undetermined intent for consistency across drug categories.

There have been many implications from the COVID-19 pandemic that began in 2020, including changes to the numbers and rates of non-fatal overdoses and overdose deaths.

  • The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the overdose crisis.
    • Overdose deaths increased 82% from 2019 to 2023, with a 40% jump in 2020 during the first year of the pandemic. The rate of people who have died from overdose has also worsened in some communities.
  • There were large impacts to ED visits during the pandemic.
    • There was a large drop in the number of people going to the ED for any reason (ED utilization) starting in March 2020 when the COVID-19 stay-at-home order was implemented.
    • Despite the drop in ED utilization, ED visits for overdose increased by 23% from 2019 to 2020.

For decades, certain communities have faced consistent barriers due to policies that emphasized criminal punishment rather than support for people with addiction.

These barriers have taken root in critical systems, including education, employment, housing, child welfare, immigration and public benefits.

  • This has caused differences in health outcomes among groups of people, including differences based on race and ethnicity, and for justice-involved populations.
    • Different populations tend to use substances differently.
    • Some substances have been penalized more strictly than others, and these differences in enforcement have affected various groups unevenly.
    • Because of this, overdose and substance use surveillance and prevention should be inclusive of all substance use, not just specific types of substances.
  • Often times, information about community and the environmental contributors of substance use are not collected alongside health outcome data, like overdoses.
    • Special research studies linking datasets and systems can offer some insights.
  •  For some examples, visit More Data Resources on the NC Overdose Epidemic Data website.
    • NC-SUDORS also provides insights into social drivers of health and circumstances surrounding overdoses by combining data from death certificates, medical examiner reports, autopsies and toxicology results.
Who we count — and how — changes what we know about overdoses.

The most reliable way to collect information on race and ethnicity is when it is self-reported, where individuals choose the race and ethnicity they use to describe themselves.

Asking someone to report their own race and ethnicity ensures the data are accurate.

  • In some cases, race and ethnicity may not be self-reported and may instead be assigned based on someone’s name or their appearance.
  • This assumption may happen if the person was unresponsive from an overdose when EMS responded or when they arrived at the ED.
  • This assumption can result in misclassification of race and ethnicity, when someone is categorized into a racial or ethnic group that they do not identify with.

For more information on how race and ethnicity are collected in the data sources IVPB uses, and how IVPB groups race and ethnicity, visit Using Injury Data by Race and Ethnicity.

Monitoring Overdoses by Demographic Groups
IVPB uses rates to compare the burden of overdoses across groups, including by age group, sex and race/ethnicity.

This approach allows IVPB to identify groups that are experiencing the greatest burden of overdose.

  • Rates account for the size of the population and allow us to compare injuries that happened in small populations to injuries in larger groups.
  • Comparing rates helps us understand different experiences of overdose between groups. 

For example:

  • The overall number of overdose deaths in 2023 was still highest among non-Hispanic white people.
  • However, when measured as a proportion of the population, American Indian/Indigenous people have the highest overdose death rate.

For more information, visit Understanding Counts and Rates.

IVPB also monitors how rates are changing over time across different groups.

It isn’t only important to monitor which groups have the highest rates, but also how fast rates may be increasing or changing for specific groups over time.

  • For example, the rate of people who have died from overdose has worsened in some communities.
  • The increase in overdose death rates from before COVID-19 in 2019 to 2023 was greatest for Black or African American people and Hispanic people, an increase of 200% or more.
    • Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the overdose death rate for Black residents in NC was lower than that of white residents.
    • Since 2020, the rate among Black residents has climbed at a faster pace, and in 2023 the overdose death rate among Black residents rose higher than the rate among white residents.

IVPB uses several datasets to understand and provide context to overdoses in NC, but this still does not capture the full burden of overdose.

IVPB monitors data on overdose deaths as well as hospitalizations, ED visits and EMS responses related to overdose. Other data sources are also used to understand context around health experiences and other related drivers of health.

  • While this captures many of the health outcomes related to overdose, it is important to keep in mind what is not captured in these data, such as:
    • Overdoses where the person does not seek health care.
  • This may involve self-administered or community naloxone reversals.
  • Community naloxone reversal data are provided to IVPB through annual reporting required of all Syringe Service Programs (SSPs), but these counts are still an incomplete picture as some reversals may not be reported to SSPs.
    • Impacts from using substances that are not regularly monitored or tested for in health care settings or during autopsy.
    • Some social factors, drivers of health and other health outcomes related to substance use disorders.
  • Because of this, we may be underestimating the true scope of the overdose crisis in NC and the prevalence of certain types of substance use.
How Many People Are Using Drugs?

People often want to know how many people are using, misusing or injecting drugs, or how many people have a substance use disorder in their area to help with overdose prevention planning.

  • It is very difficult to know the number of people who are using or misusing drugs.
    • People may or may not be honest when responding to survey questions asking about their drug use.
    • The stigma surrounding drug use and the illegality of most drug use makes it difficult to collect this data.
  • The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) is the best source for estimated numbers of people currently using different substances.
    • NSDUH is a national survey that provides up-to-date information on tobacco, alcohol and drug use, mental health and other health-related issues.
    • Data are only available nationally and at the state level.
  • It can be difficult to apply state estimates to the county level since drug usage can vary greatly from community to community.
  • The NC Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) also includes questions related to historical and current substance use for middle and high school students.
  • It is important to keep in mind that not everyone that uses substances has a substance use disorder.
Overdose Prevention Information

Additional information about NC’s response efforts can be found on the NCDHHS Overdose Epidemic page. 

This page outlines efforts to prevent overdose in NC and includes:

Questions About IVPB Overdose Data
Contact Us
Custom Injury Data Requests
Epidemiology Office Hours 
On This Page Jump Links
Off